Gian Luca Tanner vs Mikail Alimli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Gian Luca Tanner has recently secured 40.42% of points on his second serve, while Mikail Alimli has achieved 41.73%. Which player handles their second serve better? Mikail Alimli seems slightly more effective here.
• Return Game Stats: Tanner wins 44.95% of opponent's second serve points and 32.77% on first serve returns. Meanwhile, Alimli claims 45.30% of second and 24.33% of first serve points. Is Tanner's first serve return strength significant? Yes, it provides him an edge in the matchup.
• Pressure Situations: Tanner saves 43.11% of breakpoints faced, compared to Alimli's 44.09%. Who performs better under pressure? Alimli edges out Tanner slightly, indicating better breakpoint defense.
• Overall Performance: Tanner has captured 71.43% of his matches in the past year, compared to Alimli's 41.67%. Which player is in better form? Clearly, Tanner has a stronger winning record.
• Surface Proficiency: Tanner's best is on Hard courts (63% win), while his weaker performance is on Clay (53%). Alimli excels on I.hard surfaces (63%) and struggles more on Clay (42%). How does surface affect the match outcome? It depends on the surface, but Tanner generally appears more versatile.
• Match Level: Both players have primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Tanner prevailing in 71.43% of matches, versus Alimli's 42.86%. Tanner has an advantage at this competition level.
• Opponent Quality: Over the past year, Tanner faced opponents with an average ranking of 194.86, whereas Alimli's opponents averaged 229.86 in ranking. Does facing stronger opponents make Tanner more battle-tested? Yes, facing higher-ranked players likely better prepares Tanner.
• Deciding Sets: In deciding sets, Tanner won 78% of the time in the past year, while Alimli won 60%. Who is more resilient in crucial moments? Tanner shows a stronger ability to close matches.
• Break Point Conversion: Tanner converts 37.32% of break points recently, compared to Alimli's 30.36%. Who capitalizes more on opportunities? Tanner is more adept at converting break points.

Editorial Prediction (November 13, 2025, UTC):

Both players exhibit comparative strengths in their recent performances. While Mikail Alimli holds a slight edge in second-serve effectiveness and breakpoint saving, Gian Luca Tanner displays superior overall match-winning form and breakpoint conversion rate.

Tanner's impressive ability to return first serves and handle deciding sets further highlights his resilience and strategic gameplay under pressure. Moreover, he has consistently faced and triumphed over stronger opponents, which augments his competitive edge.

Considering the outlined statistics, Gian Luca Tanner emerges as the likely victor in the upcoming match, equipped with a more comprehensive set of on-court skills and advantageous experiences.